|
|
#1 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
|
I developed this for my addons with the help of a friend who is a real live copyright lawyer. It's tailored specifically for (my) addons. As you can see, it's written for Canadian law, but it should be good to go for any country that is signatory to the Berne convention - but I am not the lawyer and it might be a good idea to check with one who is versed in your jurisdiction's requirements.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
|
- If you aren't Canadian, Section 11 needs to be changed. You can get examples of similar statements for other jurisdictions here: http://www.cptech.org/ecom/ucita/lic...isdiction.html. You could also just delete Section 11. All it does is tell people that if you end up suing them, it will come from whatever jurisdiction. Lots of licences have no such clause and really, who are you honestly going to take to court over your addon anyway?
- In the US, moral rights (attribution and integrity) as referenced in Section 9 don't exist in US copyright law. They are instead generally held to be covered by libel and slander laws. Those rights are included in most other jurisdictions' copyright laws, though, so having them in there covers your bases. - This licence specifically doesn't allow modified versions of the software ("fan updates") to be created without explicit consent. If you don't want that, please consider using a different licence, or creating a new one (based on this one if you want!), but having a bunch of differing and custom versions of "Sat's Addon Licence" floating around is messy - There's a copypasta version of the licence that isn't filled out, and has those basic notes here: http://evilempireguild.org/SBF/licence.txt If you think it's what you need, use it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
Of course I've always had the disclaimer that I would remove any addon from my compilations if the addon author wanted me to remove it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Wiki Master
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
|
I wanted to criticize your spelling of "license", but it seems it's a valid spelling in British Engrish. BLAST!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Amazing Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 1,420
|
Bah, I'm still going to make fun of him. :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Legendary Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,127
|
I like licences that are longer than some of my addons
.Seriously though, game modding communities need a lot more lawyer... I mean a lot! Especially those that live for real .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wiki Master
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Asian Sheep Lover
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,033
|
Would your download site addon's description need to be modified to include the license or link to it? What about a popup license ingame for acceptance? Is the license agreement valid if the user didn't explicitly see it and agree to it?
__________________
Author/Maintainer of Postal, Omen3, GemHelper, BankItems, WoWEquip, GatherMate, Routes, HandyNotes and some others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
|
I have links to the licence on my addon pages, yep.
That licence validity question is age old. I'm hopeful that if someone ended up in court and tried the "I didn't read it so it doesn't apply!" defence, they'd get laughed at. Last edited by Satrina; 06-23-2009 at 02:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 314
|
Armour, Colour, Aluminium...... *shakes fist*
__________________
English doesn't borrow from other languages. It follows them down dark alleys, knocks them over, and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.
WowAce Forums




.
.

